Otec Richard vypr\u00e1v\u00ed, jak k\u0159es\u0165an\u00e9 p\u0159ij\u00edmali moudrost P\u00edsma t\u00edm, \u017ee o n\u011bm sly\u0161eli diskutovat mnoha r\u016fzn\u00fdmi zp\u016fsoby:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u011bt\u0161ina dne\u0161n\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f nev\u00ed, \u017ee v prvn\u00edch stolet\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed \u2013 prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm autoritativn\u00edch u\u010ditel\u016f, jako byli Origenes, Cyril Alexandrijsk\u00fd, Augustin a \u0158eho\u0159 Velik\u00fd \u2013 se podporovalo a\u017e sedm \u201esmysl\u016f\u201c P\u00edsma. Doslovn\u00fd, historick\u00fd, alegorick\u00fd, mor\u00e1ln\u00ed, symbolick\u00fd, eschatologick\u00fd (trajektorie historie a r\u016fstu) a \u201eprvotn\u00ed\u201c nebo archetyp\u00e1ln\u00ed (obecn\u011b uzn\u00e1van\u00e1 symbolika) v\u00fdznam textu byly mezi u\u010denci \u010dasto br\u00e1ny velmi v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Tyto v\u00fdznamy byly postupn\u011b p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1ny b\u011b\u017en\u00fdmi k\u0159es\u0165any prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm ned\u011bln\u00edch k\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed (co\u017e plat\u00ed i dnes). Ti, kdo je sly\u0161eli, o\u010dek\u00e1vali v\u00edce v\u00fdklad\u016f P\u00edsma.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tyto r\u016fzn\u00e9 v\u00fdznamy P\u00edsma byly n\u011bkdy p\u0159irovn\u00e1v\u00e1ny k na\u0161im lidsk\u00fdm smysl\u016fm sluchu, zraku, chuti, \u010dichu a hmatu, kter\u00e9 jsou p\u011bti odli\u0161n\u00fdmi zp\u016fsoby pozn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed stejn\u00e9 v\u011bci, ale ve velmi odli\u0161n\u00fdch \u201ejazyc\u00edch\u201c. Po reformaci a osv\u00edcenstv\u00ed z\u00e1padn\u00ed Evropan\u00e9 z praktick\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f redukovali v\u00edce zp\u016fsob\u016f pozn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed na jeden \u2013 \u00fadajn\u011b racion\u00e1ln\u00ed\/doslovn\u00fd\/historick\u00fd. V tomto bod\u011b jsme Bibli po n\u011bkolik stolet\u00ed do zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry zkomprimovali a omezili na tento jedin\u00fd v\u00fdznam, a to jak v jej\u00ed katolick\u00e9, tak protestantsk\u00e9 podob\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Na\u0161e \u0161\u00ed\u0159ka p\u00e1sma duchovn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edstupu k Bibli se t\u00edm podle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru \u2013 a jak by \u0159eklo mnoho lid\u00ed \u2013 v\u00fdrazn\u011b z\u00fa\u017eila na \u00farove\u0148, kter\u00e1 je z duchovn\u00edho hlediska nejm\u00e9n\u011b u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e1. To, \u017ee se n\u011bco \u00fadajn\u011b doslovn\u011b stalo p\u0159esn\u011b jedn\u00edm zp\u016fsobem, v jednom okam\u017eiku, samo o sob\u011b nep\u0159en\u00e1\u0161\u00ed tuto zku\u0161enost do sou\u010dasnosti, ke mn\u011b nebo k n\u00e1m. V\u011b\u0159\u00edm, \u017ee takov\u00fd p\u0159enos je transformativn\u00ed funkc\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00e9ho duchovn\u00edho textu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dazk\u00fd, racion\u00e1ln\u00ed\/doslovn\u00fd\/historick\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup do zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed staro\u017eitnickou spole\u010dnost, kter\u00e1 rad\u011bji hled\u00ed zp\u011bt, ne\u017e vp\u0159ed. Podle m\u00fdch zku\u0161enost\u00ed vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed sp\u00ed\u0161e transak\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed ne\u017e transforma\u010dn\u00ed spiritualitu. Idealizuje individu\u00e1ln\u00ed konformitu a skupinovou soun\u00e1le\u017eitost nad l\u00e1skou, slu\u017ebou nebo skute\u010dnou zm\u011bnou srdce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ve skute\u010dnosti byl liter\u00e1ln\u00ed styl diskreditov\u00e1n od po\u010d\u00e1tku Nov\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona zahrnut\u00edm \u010dty\u0159 evangelijn\u00edch zpr\u00e1v o stejn\u00e9 ud\u00e1losti Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161e, kter\u00e9 se v mnoha ohledech li\u0161\u00ed. Kter\u00e1 z nich je \u201eneomyln\u00e1\u201c?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 se opakovan\u011b rozhodl u\u010dit prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh\u016f a podobenstv\u00ed, odhaluj\u00edc\u00edch, jak\u00fd B\u016fh \u201eje\u201c:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prvn\u00ed stolet\u00ed k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed byla mnohem bl\u00ed\u017ee transracion\u00e1ln\u00edmu sv\u011btu Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161e a jeho stylu v\u00fduky prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh\u016f (kter\u00fd se nehod\u00ed pro dogmatickou nebo systematickou teologii). Evangelium \u0159\u00edk\u00e1: \u201eNikdy k nim nemluvil jinak ne\u017e v podobenstv\u00edch\u201c (Matou\u0161 13:34). Nep\u0159\u00edm\u00fd, metaforick\u00fd, symbolick\u00fd jazyk p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhu nebo podobenstv\u00ed se zd\u00e1 b\u00fdt Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161ov\u00fdm preferovan\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem v\u00fduky duchovn\u00edch realit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n T\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u0161echna Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161ova podobenstv\u00ed za\u010d\u00ednaj\u00ed stejnou fr\u00e1z\u00ed: \u201eBo\u017e\u00ed kr\u00e1lovstv\u00ed je jako\u2026\u201c. Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 si je pln\u011b v\u011bdom, \u017ee mluv\u00ed v podobenstv\u00edch, metafor\u00e1ch, p\u0159\u00edb\u011bz\u00edch a symbolech. V posledn\u00edch stolet\u00edch mu v\u0161ak mnoho k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f tuto svobodu neposkytlo, a tak n\u00e1m unik\u00e1 nebo se vyh\u00fdb\u00e1me mnoha jeho hlavn\u00edm poselstv\u00edm. Jsme t\u00edm mnohem chud\u0161\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Translated with DeepL.com (free version)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Otec Richard vypr\u00e1v\u00ed, jak k\u0159es\u0165an\u00e9 p\u0159ij\u00edmali moudrost P\u00edsma t\u00edm, \u017ee o n\u011bm sly\u0161eli diskutovat mnoha r\u016fzn\u00fdmi zp\u016fsoby:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u011bt\u0161ina dne\u0161n\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f nev\u00ed, \u017ee v prvn\u00edch stolet\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed \u2013 prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm autoritativn\u00edch u\u010ditel\u016f, jako byli Origenes, Cyril Alexandrijsk\u00fd, Augustin a \u0158eho\u0159 Velik\u00fd \u2013 se podporovalo a\u017e sedm \u201esmysl\u016f\u201c P\u00edsma. Doslovn\u00fd, historick\u00fd, alegorick\u00fd, mor\u00e1ln\u00ed, symbolick\u00fd, eschatologick\u00fd (trajektorie historie a r\u016fstu) a \u201eprvotn\u00ed\u201c nebo archetyp\u00e1ln\u00ed (obecn\u011b uzn\u00e1van\u00e1 symbolika) v\u00fdznam textu byly mezi u\u010denci \u010dasto br\u00e1ny velmi v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Tyto v\u00fdznamy byly postupn\u011b p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1ny b\u011b\u017en\u00fdmi k\u0159es\u0165any prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm ned\u011bln\u00edch k\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed (co\u017e plat\u00ed i dnes). Ti, kdo je sly\u0161eli, o\u010dek\u00e1vali v\u00edce v\u00fdklad\u016f P\u00edsma.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tyto r\u016fzn\u00e9 v\u00fdznamy P\u00edsma byly n\u011bkdy p\u0159irovn\u00e1v\u00e1ny k na\u0161im lidsk\u00fdm smysl\u016fm sluchu, zraku, chuti, \u010dichu a hmatu, kter\u00e9 jsou p\u011bti odli\u0161n\u00fdmi zp\u016fsoby pozn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed stejn\u00e9 v\u011bci, ale ve velmi odli\u0161n\u00fdch \u201ejazyc\u00edch\u201c. Po reformaci a osv\u00edcenstv\u00ed z\u00e1padn\u00ed Evropan\u00e9 z praktick\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f redukovali v\u00edce zp\u016fsob\u016f pozn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed na jeden \u2013 \u00fadajn\u011b racion\u00e1ln\u00ed\/doslovn\u00fd\/historick\u00fd. V tomto bod\u011b jsme Bibli po n\u011bkolik stolet\u00ed do zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry zkomprimovali a omezili na tento jedin\u00fd v\u00fdznam, a to jak v jej\u00ed katolick\u00e9, tak protestantsk\u00e9 podob\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Na\u0161e \u0161\u00ed\u0159ka p\u00e1sma duchovn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edstupu k Bibli se t\u00edm podle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru \u2013 a jak by \u0159eklo mnoho lid\u00ed \u2013 v\u00fdrazn\u011b z\u00fa\u017eila na \u00farove\u0148, kter\u00e1 je z duchovn\u00edho hlediska nejm\u00e9n\u011b u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e1. To, \u017ee se n\u011bco \u00fadajn\u011b doslovn\u011b stalo p\u0159esn\u011b jedn\u00edm zp\u016fsobem, v jednom okam\u017eiku, samo o sob\u011b nep\u0159en\u00e1\u0161\u00ed tuto zku\u0161enost do sou\u010dasnosti, ke mn\u011b nebo k n\u00e1m. V\u011b\u0159\u00edm, \u017ee takov\u00fd p\u0159enos je transformativn\u00ed funkc\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00e9ho duchovn\u00edho textu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dazk\u00fd, racion\u00e1ln\u00ed\/doslovn\u00fd\/historick\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup do zna\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00edry vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed staro\u017eitnickou spole\u010dnost, kter\u00e1 rad\u011bji hled\u00ed zp\u011bt, ne\u017e vp\u0159ed. Podle m\u00fdch zku\u0161enost\u00ed vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed sp\u00ed\u0161e transak\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed ne\u017e transforma\u010dn\u00ed spiritualitu. Idealizuje individu\u00e1ln\u00ed konformitu a skupinovou soun\u00e1le\u017eitost nad l\u00e1skou, slu\u017ebou nebo skute\u010dnou zm\u011bnou srdce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ve skute\u010dnosti byl liter\u00e1ln\u00ed styl diskreditov\u00e1n od po\u010d\u00e1tku Nov\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona zahrnut\u00edm \u010dty\u0159 evangelijn\u00edch zpr\u00e1v o stejn\u00e9 ud\u00e1losti Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161e, kter\u00e9 se v mnoha ohledech li\u0161\u00ed. Kter\u00e1 z nich je \u201eneomyln\u00e1\u201c?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 se opakovan\u011b rozhodl u\u010dit prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh\u016f a podobenstv\u00ed, odhaluj\u00edc\u00edch, jak\u00fd B\u016fh \u201eje\u201c:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prvn\u00ed stolet\u00ed k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed byla mnohem bl\u00ed\u017ee transracion\u00e1ln\u00edmu sv\u011btu Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161e a jeho stylu v\u00fduky prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh\u016f (kter\u00fd se nehod\u00ed pro dogmatickou nebo systematickou teologii). Evangelium \u0159\u00edk\u00e1: \u201eNikdy k nim nemluvil jinak ne\u017e v podobenstv\u00edch\u201c (Matou\u0161 13:34). Nep\u0159\u00edm\u00fd, metaforick\u00fd, symbolick\u00fd jazyk p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhu nebo podobenstv\u00ed se zd\u00e1 b\u00fdt Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161ov\u00fdm preferovan\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem v\u00fduky duchovn\u00edch realit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n T\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u0161echna Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161ova podobenstv\u00ed za\u010d\u00ednaj\u00ed stejnou fr\u00e1z\u00ed: \u201eBo\u017e\u00ed kr\u00e1lovstv\u00ed je jako\u2026\u201c. Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 si je pln\u011b v\u011bdom, \u017ee mluv\u00ed v podobenstv\u00edch, metafor\u00e1ch, p\u0159\u00edb\u011bz\u00edch a symbolech. V posledn\u00edch stolet\u00edch mu v\u0161ak mnoho k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f tuto svobodu neposkytlo, a tak n\u00e1m unik\u00e1 nebo se vyh\u00fdb\u00e1me mnoha jeho hlavn\u00edm poselstv\u00edm. Jsme t\u00edm mnohem chud\u0161\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Translated with DeepL.com (free version)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" V\u011bt\u0161ina dne\u0161n\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f nev\u00ed, \u017ee v prvn\u00edch stolet\u00edch k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed \u2013 prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm autoritativn\u00edch u\u010ditel\u016f, jako byli Origenes, Cyril Alexandrijsk\u00fd, Augustin a \u0158eho\u0159 Velik\u00fd \u2013 se podporovalo a\u017e sedm \u201esmysl\u016f\u201c P\u00edsma. Doslovn\u00fd, historick\u00fd, alegorick\u00fd, mor\u00e1ln\u00ed, symbolick\u00fd, eschatologick\u00fd (trajektorie historie a r\u016fstu) a \u201eprvotn\u00ed\u201c nebo archetyp\u00e1ln\u00ed (obecn\u011b uzn\u00e1van\u00e1 symbolika) v\u00fdznam textu byly mezi u\u010denci \u010dasto br\u00e1ny velmi v\u00e1\u017en\u011b. Tyto v\u00fdznamy byly postupn\u011b p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1ny b\u011b\u017en\u00fdmi k\u0159es\u0165any prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm ned\u011bln\u00edch k\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed (co\u017e plat\u00ed i dnes). Ti, kdo je sly\u0161eli, o\u010dek\u00e1vali v\u00edce v\u00fdklad\u016f P\u00edsma.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13902,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[198],"tags":[932,367,946],"class_list":["post-13914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-richard-rohr-ofm-centrum-pro-zivot-a-rozjimani","tag-pismo","tag-reformace","tag-vyklad-pisma","latest_post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13914"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13914\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13915,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13914\/revisions\/13915"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Sedm v\u00fdklad\u016f smyslu P\u00edsma<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Reformace p\u0159ijala jen racion\u00e1ln\u00ed a historick\u00fd v\u00fdklad<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Racion\u00e1ln\u00edmu v\u00fdkladu chyb\u00ed duchovn\u00ed \u0161\u00ed\u0159e<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Evangelia jsou od sebe rozd\u00edln\u00e1 a to je dob\u0159e<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 vypr\u00e1v\u011bl p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhy a podobenstv\u00ed o tom jak\u00fd je B\u016fh<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Hlavn\u00ed poselstv\u00ed je Bo\u017e\u00ed kr\u00e1lovstv\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prameny:<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
V\u00edce ne\u017e jeden v\u00fdznam<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
Co d\u011bl\u00e1me s Bibl\u00ed? – \u010ctvrtek, 29. ledna 2026<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Sedm v\u00fdklad\u016f smyslu P\u00edsma<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Reformace p\u0159ijala jen racion\u00e1ln\u00ed a historick\u00fd v\u00fdklad<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Racion\u00e1ln\u00edmu v\u00fdkladu chyb\u00ed duchovn\u00ed \u0161\u00ed\u0159e<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Evangelia jsou od sebe rozd\u00edln\u00e1 a to je dob\u0159e<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 vypr\u00e1v\u011bl p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhy a podobenstv\u00ed o tom jak\u00fd je B\u016fh<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Hlavn\u00ed poselstv\u00ed je Bo\u017e\u00ed kr\u00e1lovstv\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n