Historick\u00fd v\u00fdvoj v\u0161ech denominac\u00ed se opakuje<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Cesta nov\u00e9 c\u00edrkve je p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e1. Zakladatel\u00e9 jsou typicky velkorys\u00ed, vizion\u00e1\u0159\u0161t\u00ed, odv\u00e1\u017en\u00ed a kreativn\u00ed. N\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed, kter\u00e1 zd\u00e1nliv\u011b pokra\u010duj\u00ed v jejich pr\u00e1ci, se \u010dasto st\u00e1vaj\u00ed opakem. Jsou sv\u00e1zan\u00e1, neochotn\u00e1 ke zm\u011bn\u011b, nostalgick\u00e1, boj\u00e1cn\u00e1, posedl\u00e1 \u00fadr\u017ebou st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edho stavu, bojuj\u00ed o pozice a pen\u00edze. M\u00edsto toho, aby byli vst\u0159\u00edcn\u00ed sv\u011btu a otev\u0159eli mu svou n\u00e1ru\u010d, jak to d\u011blali jejich zakladatel\u00e9, tak jejich n\u00e1stupci stoj\u00ed na str\u00e1\u017ei sv\u00fdch bran se za\u0165at\u00fdmi p\u011bstmi. Neposiluj\u00ed ostatn\u00ed, jak to d\u011blali jejich zakladatel\u00e9, hromad\u00ed moc. M\u00edsto toho, aby se vzep\u0159eli tradici a po\u017eadovali mor\u00e1ln\u00ed p\u0159edstavivost pro sou\u010dasnost, jak to d\u011blali jejich zakladatel\u00e9, vnucuj\u00ed \u010dlen\u016fm tradice a chr\u00e1n\u00ed jejich my\u0161len\u00ed mimo hranice. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
nakonec z\u016fstane jen n\u00e1zev podle zakladatele<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
N\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se od\u0159\u00edzne od p\u0159\u00edkladu sv\u00e9ho zakladatele, zat\u00edmco st\u00e1le nese jm\u00e9no zakladatele, se \u010dasto st\u00e1v\u00e1 jen o m\u00e1lo v\u00edc ne\u017e kaplanem \u2013 slu\u017eebn\u00edkem i pro jin\u00e9 ideologie a nab\u00edz\u00ed sv\u00e9 slu\u017eby t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed nab\u00edzej\u00ed nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed nab\u00eddku. Nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee tolik v\u011b\u0159\u00edc\u00edch lid\u00ed se dnes opot\u0159ebov\u00e1v\u00e1, vyho\u0159\u00ed a odch\u00e1z\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a to je p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost za\u010d\u00edt si kl\u00e1st ot\u00e1zky na t\u011blo<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
A nen\u00ed divu, \u017ee st\u00e1le v\u00edce z n\u00e1s, a\u0165 u\u017e jsme se do k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed narodili nebo si jej zvolili nebo oboje, se ocit\u00e1 v situaci, kdy jen krout\u00edme hlavou a pt\u00e1me se: „Co se stalo s k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00edm? Co se stalo s Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161em a jeho kr\u00e1sn\u00fdm poselstv\u00edm?“ [1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Slu\u017eebnice, podnikatelka a spisovatelka Cameron Trimble vid\u00ed \u00fapadek c\u00edrkevn\u00edch struktur jako p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost kl\u00e1st si ot\u00e1zky, na kter\u00fdch opravdu z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed, znovu objevit a obnovit na\u0161i v\u00edru:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Co je ve skute\u010dnosti c\u00edrkev? C\u00edrkev jsem v\u017edy ch\u00e1pal jako spole\u010denstv\u00ed se spole\u010dn\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhem v na\u0161ich p\u00edsmech, kter\u00fd n\u00e1s spojuje. C\u00edrkev je o propl\u00e9t\u00e1n\u00ed vztah\u016f , tak aby \u017eivot n\u00e1s v\u0161ech byl st\u00e1le v\u00edce zako\u0159en\u011bn v L\u00e1sce. Dnes bych se cht\u011bl zamyslet nad t\u00edm, \u017ee c\u00edrkev je tak\u00e9 prost\u0159ed\u00ed pro spole\u010dnou snahu budovat sv\u011bt, kter\u00fd by byl schopen postarat se o dobro n\u00e1s v\u0161ech. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Jsme v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00edci, milenci, tv\u016frci pokoje, ochr\u00e1nci, proroci, myslitel\u00e9 a sn\u00edlci, kte\u0159\u00ed se sch\u00e1zej\u00ed, aby oslavili na\u0161e spole\u010dn\u00e9 d\u011bdictv\u00ed jako Bo\u017e\u00ed d\u011bti . Z\u00e1rove\u0148 jsme ochotni neboj\u00e1cn\u011b povstat a br\u00e1nit ty, kter\u00e9 by na\u0161e kultura mohla utla\u010dovat. Kdy\u017e si uv\u011bdomujeme si sv\u00e9 \u017eivotn\u00ed s\u00edly utv\u00e1\u0159et n\u00e1\u0161 sv\u011bt k dobr\u00e9mu, pak m\u00e1 n\u00e1\u0161 \u017eivot smysl. St\u00e1v\u00e1me se lid\u0161t\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi a n\u00e1\u0161 \u017eivot je v\u00edce posv\u00e1tn\u00fd. Jsme v\u00edce celistv\u00ed. . . .<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dnes je n\u00e1m d\u00e1na p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost ke zm\u011bn\u011b. Mus\u00edme se rozhodnout. Bu\u010f budeme i nad\u00e1le jen p\u0159e\u017e\u00edvat a zoufale lp\u011bt na st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edm syst\u00e9mu a dosavadn\u00edm zp\u016fsobu \u017eivota a nebo se v\u017eijeme do role pr\u016fkopn\u00edk\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed se vyd\u00e1vaj\u00ed do nezn\u00e1ma objevovat nov\u00e9 zp\u016fsoby, jak naplnit \u017eivot v\u00edrou. Sou\u010dasn\u00fd \u00fapadek na\u0161ich dosavadn\u00edch struktur n\u00e1m d\u00e1v\u00e1 \u0161anci nechat je za sebou a vydat se na dobrodru\u017estv\u00ed p\u0159em\u011bny. Nic nebude stejn\u00e9 za deset let. Pro\u010d se tedy nevrhnout u\u017e dnes na zm\u011bnu na\u0161eho p\u0159\u00edstupu k v\u00ed\u0159e, kter\u00fd bychom vid\u011bli n\u011bkdy a\u017e za dvacet \u010di pades\u00e1t let? Co vlastn\u011b m\u016f\u017eeme ztratit? [2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n [1] Brian D. McLaren, The Great Spiritual Migration: How the World\u2019s Largest Religion Is Seeking a Better Way to Be Christian<\/u><\/em> (New York: Convergent, 2016), 5\u20136.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [2] Cameron Trimble, Piloting Church: Helping Your Congregation Take Flight<\/u><\/em> (St. Louis, MO: Chalice Press, 2019), 132. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Image credit:<\/u><\/strong> Jenna Keiper, Untitled Church I<\/u><\/em> (detail), 2020, photograph, New Mexico, used with permission. Toni Frissell, Minnie Burden, barefoot, riding a horse<\/u><\/em> (detail), 1964, photograph, Library of Congress<\/u><\/a>, public domain. Jenna Keiper, Untitled Window<\/u><\/em> (detail), 2020, photograph, New Mexico, used with permission. Jenna Keiper and Leslye Colvin, 2022, triptych art, United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This week’s images appear in a form inspired by early Christian\/Catholic triptych art: a threefold form that tells a unified story. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Image inspiration:<\/u><\/strong> The left and right photos are of stone monuments: solid and unmoving. Between them the fresh energy and movement of a horse and rider breathe life into this trio of images. How can we stay connected to the energetic, movement origins of our religions?<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nC\u00edrkev jsou vztahy Bo\u017e\u00edch d\u011bt\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
I ve sv\u00e9 r\u016fznosti a odli\u0161nosti se m\u016f\u017eeme dohodnout nad spole\u010dn\u00fdm d\u011bdictv\u00edm<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\u00dapadek c\u00edrkve je \u0161ance zm\u011bnit zp\u016fsob \u017eivota<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prameny:<\/h5>\n\n\n\n