Proroci<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\u00dalohou proroka je \u0159\u00eddit a vysv\u011btlit nezbytnou rekonstrukci. Prorokova cesta je proto sestupn\u00e1 a nikdy nen\u00ed popul\u00e1rn\u00ed ani snadn\u00e1. Jde o to zbavit se iluz\u00ed a svrhnout fale\u0161n\u00e9 bohy. Jak kon\u010d\u00ed Proroci? N\u011bkdy byli i zab\u00edjeni.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prav\u00ed kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed mluv\u00ed o jednot\u011b, spole\u010denstv\u00ed, l\u00e1sce, transcendenci, n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed, spojov\u00e1n\u00ed sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho sv\u011bta s budouc\u00edm sv\u011btem a o hled\u00e1n\u00ed smyslu na\u0161\u00ed cesty k nov\u00e9 soudr\u017enosti. Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed jsou zn\u00e1mi t\u00edm, \u017ee rychle zavedou novou skute\u010dnost a pak ve sv\u00e9 kultu\u0159e znovu zpohodln\u00ed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed je dostatek, prorok\u016f je m\u00e1lo, alespo\u0148 tak se mi to jev\u00ed. V\u00fdsledkem pak bylo n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed jeho\u017e c\u00edlem bylo zase n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed. Chceme-li vytv\u00e1\u0159et nov\u00fd sv\u011bt, mus\u00edme opustit star\u00fd?[1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Odbornice na n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed Diana Butler Bass se zmi\u0148uje o nap\u011bt\u00ed v k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed mezi pastorac\u00ed a proroctv\u00edm, jakmile se za\u010dne n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed strachovat o sv\u00e9 institucion\u00e1ln\u00ed status quo:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n N\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 instituce bojuj\u00ed mezi pastora\u010dn\u00edm stylem a prorock\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem, mezi \u00fat\u011bchou a rozru\u0161en\u00edm. V re\u00e1lu jsou instituce ze sv\u00e9 podstaty p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm pastora\u010dn\u00ed \u2013 sna\u017e\u00ed se udr\u017eovat to co je. \u00dat\u011bchu poskytuj\u00ed posv\u011bcen\u00edm sd\u00edlen\u00fdch hodnot a ctnost\u00ed t\u00e9 \u010di on\u00e9 komunity. obhajuj\u00ed v\u011bci tak jak jsou s odkazem na bo\u017esk\u00fd nebo nadp\u0159irozen\u00fd \u0159\u00e1d. M\u011bn\u00ed se jen velmi pomalu. Instituce se sna\u017e\u00ed odol\u00e1vat tlaku prorok\u016f. Proroci maj\u00ed p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 mnoho ot\u00e1zek. Jejich snahou je aby aby se v\u011bci d\u011bly jinak. P\u0159esv\u011bd\u010duj\u00ed lidi, aby se k sob\u011b chovali l\u00e9pe. Prost\u011b cht\u011bj\u00ed zm\u011bnu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n D\u011bjiny k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ed lze proto vysv\u011btlovat vypr\u00e1v\u011bt jako p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh nap\u011bt\u00ed mezi \u0159\u00e1dem a proroctv\u00edm. Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 p\u0159i\u0161el jako prorok. Zpochybnil a prom\u011bnil judaismus. Charismatick\u00e1 komunita, kter\u00e1 vyrostla kolem jeho u\u010den\u00ed se nakonec zformovala do c\u00edrkve. C\u00edrkev se zorganizovala a pak se stala instituc\u00ed. Instituce poskytla veden\u00ed a motivaci pro mnoho milion\u016f lid\u00ed. Ale pak se za\u010dala opev\u0148ovat. Chr\u00e1nila svoji moc a bohatstv\u00ed. St\u0159e\u017eila sv\u016fj vliv ve sv\u011bt\u011b a sp\u00e1su, kterou nab\u00edzela.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Zd\u00e1lo se po dlouhou dobu, \u017ee mnoho lid\u00ed v c\u00edrkvi si toho nev\u0161imlo. Ale n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed ano. To, co c\u00edrkev u\u010dila, se jim zd\u00e1lo b\u00fdt v rozporu s jejich \u017eivotn\u00ed zku\u0161enost\u00ed nebo se p\u0159edstavou o Bohu. . . . Zpochyb\u0148ovali zp\u016fsob, jak\u00fdm se v\u011bci v c\u00edrkvi d\u011blaj\u00ed. Experimentovali s nov\u00fdmi my\u0161lenkami a duchovn\u00edmi praktikami. . . . Oh\u00fdbali pravidla a \u010dasto je poru\u0161ovali. Zaveden\u00e1 c\u00edrkev je obvykle ignorovala, n\u011bkdy tolerovala, ale \u010dasto je ozna\u010dovala za heretiky, sna\u017eila se je ovl\u00e1dnout a ob\u010das je i zabila. Kdy\u017e se v\u0161ak do \u0159ad nespokojen\u00fdch \u010dlen\u016f c\u00edrkve zapojilo dostate\u010dn\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed lid\u00ed, musela institucion\u00e1ln\u00ed c\u00edrkev zm\u011bn\u00e1m v\u011bnovat pozornost. Nakonec \u2013 a n\u011bkdy ne\u00famysln\u011b umo\u017enila c\u00edrkve skute\u010dnou zm\u011bnu a obnovu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Organizovan\u00e9 n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed se takov\u00fdch n\u00e1hl\u00fdch zm\u011bn boj\u00ed; ale duchovn\u00ed v\u00fdbuchy t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u017edy p\u0159edch\u00e1zej\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9 reform\u011b. M\u016f\u017ee fungovat duchovn\u00ed nespokojenost i dnes? Jsou i dnes mezi n\u00e1mi proroci? M\u016f\u017ee se st\u00e1t \u017ee instituce za\u010dnou naslouchat , m\u011bnit se? Mohou za\u010d\u00edt b\u00fdt vn\u00edmav\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a relevantn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed? [2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n [1] Adapted from Richard Rohr, The Wisdom Pattern: Order, Disorder, Reorder<\/u><\/a><\/em> (Cincinnati, OH: Franciscan Media, 2001, 2020), 196.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [2] Diana Butler Bass, Christianity After Religion: The End of Church and the Birth of a New Spiritual Awakening<\/u><\/em> (New York: HarperOne, 2012), 88\u201389, 91. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Image credit:<\/u><\/strong> Jenna Keiper, Untitled Church I<\/u><\/em> (detail), 2020, photograph, New Mexico, used with permission. Toni Frissell, Minnie Burden, barefoot, riding a horse<\/u><\/em> (detail), 1964, photograph, Library of Congress<\/u><\/a>, public domain. Jenna Keiper, Untitled Window<\/u><\/em> (detail), 2020, photograph, New Mexico, used with permission. Jenna Keiper and Leslye Colvin, 2022, triptych art, United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This week’s images appear in a form inspired by early Christian\/Catholic triptych art: a threefold form that tells a unified story. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Image inspiration:<\/u><\/strong> The left and right photos are of stone monuments: solid and unmoving. Between them the fresh energy and movement of a horse and rider breathe life into this trio of images. How can we stay connected to the energetic, movement origins of our religions?<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nN\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed hled\u00e1 rovnov\u00e1hu mezi \u00fat\u011bchou a rozru\u0161en\u00edm<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Zm\u011bnu v\u017edy prov\u00e1z\u00ed nap\u011bt\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Proroci byli v c\u00edrkvi v\u017edy – ne v\u017edy byli p\u0159ijati<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
A jak se postav\u00edme k prorok\u016fm dnes my?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prameny:<\/h5>\n\n\n\n