Hebrejsk\u00e1 p\u00edsma jsou sebekritick\u00e1<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Hebrejsk\u00e1 P\u00edsma navzdory v\u0161em n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00fdm o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00edm zahrnuj\u00ed to, co by v\u011bt\u0161ina z n\u00e1s nazvala probl\u00e9mem – negativn\u00ed, n\u00e1hodn\u00e9, h\u0159\u00ed\u0161n\u00e9 – jako p\u0159esnou ar\u00e9nu pro bo\u017esk\u00e9 zjeven\u00ed. Ve starov\u011bk\u00fdch P\u00edsmech nenajdeme dokonale mor\u00e1ln\u00ed lidi; dokonce i Abraham pom\u011brn\u011b krut\u011b vyhnal svou druhou \u017eenu i s d\u00edt\u011btem na pou\u0161\u0165. \u017didovsk\u00fd n\u00e1rod se v rozporu s t\u00edm, co by se dalo o\u010dek\u00e1vat, rozhodl prezentovat sv\u00e9 arogantn\u00ed a zl\u00e9 kr\u00e1le a sv\u00e9 velmi kritick\u00e9 proroky jako sou\u010d\u00e1st sv\u00e9ho P\u00edsma svat\u00e9ho. Obsahuj\u00ed p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhy a proroctv\u00ed, kter\u00e1 \u017eidovsk\u00e9mu n\u00e1rodu ne\u0159\u00edkaj\u00ed, jak je \u00fa\u017easn\u00fd, ale naopak, jak je hrozn\u00fd! Tak se rod\u00ed sebekritick\u00e9 my\u0161len\u00ed a posouv\u00e1 v\u011bdom\u00ed kup\u0159edu. Takovou schopnost\u00ed sebekritiky se a\u017e do na\u0161\u00ed doby nepy\u0161n\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 jin\u00e9 n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed. [1]<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u017didovsk\u00fd rab\u00edn a zn\u00e1m\u00fd teolog Abraham Joshua Heschel ch\u00e1pal takov\u00e9 sebekritick\u00e9 my\u0161len\u00ed a nesouhlas jako \u00fast\u0159edn\u00ed prvek judaismu a v\u0161ech \u017eiv\u00fdch a zdrav\u00fdch n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed:\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u0161em tradi\u010dn\u00edm n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00edm je vlastn\u00ed nebezpe\u010d\u00ed stagnace. To, co se ust\u00e1l\u00ed a zavede, se m\u016f\u017ee snadno zvrhnout. Pronikavost je nahrazena kli\u0161\u00e9, pru\u017enost zatvrzelost\u00ed, spont\u00e1nnost zvykem. Akty nesouhlasu se ukazuj\u00ed jako akty obnovy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Proto je pro v\u011b\u0159\u00edc\u00ed lidi \u017eivotn\u011b d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 vyjad\u0159ovat a oce\u0148ovat nesouhlas. A nesouhlas znamen\u00e1 sebezkoum\u00e1n\u00ed, kritiku, nespokojenost. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Disent je \u017eidovstv\u00ed vlastn\u00ed. Proroci starov\u011bk\u00e9ho Izraele, kte\u0159\u00ed se bou\u0159ili proti n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed, je\u017e m\u011blo slou\u017eit pouze vlastn\u00edm z\u00e1jm\u016fm nebo p\u0159e\u017eit\u00ed lidu, dodnes vystupuj\u00ed jako inspirace a p\u0159\u00edklad disentu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u00fdrazn\u00fdm rysem, kter\u00fd dominuje v\u0161em \u017eidovsk\u00fdm knih\u00e1m sepsan\u00fdm b\u011bhem prvn\u00edch p\u011bti set let na\u0161eho letopo\u010dtu, je skute\u010dnost, \u017ee spolu s normativn\u00edm n\u00e1zorem je t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u017edy nab\u00edzen i n\u00e1zor nesouhlasn\u00fd, a\u0165 u\u017e v teologii, nebo v pr\u00e1vu. Disent p\u0159etrv\u00e1val i v nejlep\u0161\u00edch obdob\u00edch \u017eidovsk\u00fdch d\u011bjin: velc\u00ed u\u010denci ost\u0159e nesouhlasili s Maimonidem; chasidismus, kter\u00fd vnesl do \u017eidovsk\u00e9ho \u017eivota tolik osv\u00edcen\u00ed a inspirace, byl hnut\u00edm disentu. . . . Tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed disent vych\u00e1z\u00ed z l\u00e1sky a v\u00edry, nab\u00edz\u00ed pozitivn\u00ed alternativy, vizi. [2]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Otec Richard se sna\u017e\u00ed o p\u0159\u00edstup „oboj\u00ed“, kter\u00fd zahrnuje sebekritiku, ani\u017e by upadal do p\u0159\u00edli\u0161n\u00e9ho intelektualismu nebo zoufalstv\u00ed: <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sebekritika je v d\u011bjin\u00e1ch n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed pom\u011brn\u011b vz\u00e1cn\u00e1, p\u0159esto je nezbytn\u00e1, aby n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed uchr\u00e1nila p\u0159ed p\u0159irozen\u00fdm sklonem k arogantn\u00edmu sebev\u011bdom\u00ed – a nakonec k modloslu\u017eb\u011b, kter\u00e1 je pro biblick\u00fd Izrael v\u017edy hlavn\u00edm h\u0159\u00edchem. Mus\u00edme v\u0161ak tak\u00e9 upozornit, \u017ee pouh\u00e1 kritika se obvykle zvrhne v cynismus, skepsi, akademickou aroganci, a dokonce postmodern\u00ed nihilismus. Proto bu\u010fte velmi opatrn\u00ed a velmi se modlete, ne\u017e si p\u0159ivlastn\u00edte jak\u00fdkoli sebeobraz profesion\u00e1ln\u00edho kritika nebo pomazan\u00e9ho proroka! Negativita v\u00e1s zni\u010d\u00ed. [3]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Translated with www.DeepL.com\/Translator (free version), nadpisy p\u0159ekladatel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n [1] Adapted from Richard Rohr, Things Hidden: Scripture as Spirituality<\/em><\/a> (Cincinnati, OH: Franciscan Media, 2008, 2022), 14.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [2] Abraham Joshua Heschel, \u201cDissent,\u201d in A New Hasidism: Roots<\/em>, ed. Arthur Green and Ariel Evan Mayse (Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 2019), 174\u2013175.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [3] Rohr, Things Hidden<\/em>, 14.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Image credit:<\/strong> Carrie Grace Littauer, Untitled<\/em> 7 <\/em>(detail), 2022, photograph, Colorado, used with permission. Menachem Weinreb, two Jewish boxes of tefillin unwrapped<\/em> (detail), <\/em>2021, <\/em>photograph<\/a>, Jerusalem. Arthur Allen, Untitled 12 <\/em>(detail), 2022, photograph, France, used with permission. Jenna Keiper, 2022, triptych art, United States. Click here<\/a> to enlarge image.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This week\u2019s images appear in a form inspired by early Christian\/Catholic triptych art: a threefold form that tells a unified story. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Image inspiration:<\/strong> God, unveiled, in our deepest rituals and traditions as well as in the simplicity of light moving across stones and trees.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" V\u00fdrazn\u00fdm rysem, kter\u00fd dominuje v\u0161em \u017eidovsk\u00fdm knih\u00e1m sepsan\u00fdm b\u011bhem prvn\u00edch p\u011bti set let na\u0161eho letopo\u010dtu, je skute\u010dnost, \u017ee spolu s normativn\u00edm n\u00e1zorem je t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 v\u017edy nab\u00edzen i n\u00e1zor nesouhlasn\u00fd, a\u0165 u\u017e v teologii, nebo v pr\u00e1vu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4659,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[198],"tags":[520,522],"class_list":["post-4706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-richard-rohr-ofm-centrum-pro-zivot-a-rozjimani","tag-disent","tag-sebektritika","latest_post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4706"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4708,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4706\/revisions\/4708"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Pozor na stagnaci \u2013 vyjad\u0159uj nesouhlas nahlas<\/h4>\n\n\n
<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Tv\u016fr\u010d\u00ed disent vych\u00e1z\u00ed z l\u00e1sky a v\u00edry<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Sebekritika ano, ale kritika na n\u00ed pozor<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prameny:<\/h5>\n\n\n\n