Richard Rohr se zam\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed nad t\u00edm, jak p\u0159eb\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed v posv\u00e1tn\u00e9m prostoru nakonec zahrnuje vid\u011bn\u00ed Boha a sv\u011bta skrze jednotnou vizi. Toho v\u0161ak nedos\u00e1hneme bez ur\u010dit\u00e9ho druhu utrpen\u00ed:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n V\u017edy, kdy\u017e jsme vyvedeni z norm\u00e1lu do posv\u00e1tn\u00e9ho, otev\u0159en\u00e9ho prostoru, budeme to poci\u0165ovat jako utrpen\u00ed, proto\u017ee jde o opu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed toho, na co jsme zvykl\u00ed. To je v\u017edy bolestn\u00e9, ale \u010d\u00e1st n\u00e1s mus\u00ed zem\u0159\u00edt, m\u00e1me-li se n\u011bkdy zv\u011bt\u0161it (Jan 12,24).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pokud nejsme ochotni pustit a zem\u0159\u00edt sv\u00e9mu mal\u00e9mu j\u00e1, nevstoup\u00edme do \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9ho nov\u00e9ho nebo posv\u00e1tn\u00e9ho prostoru.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Proroci n\u00e1s vedou do posv\u00e1tn\u00e9ho prostoru t\u00edm, \u017ee n\u00e1m ukazuj\u00ed nedostate\u010dnost star\u00e9ho \u0159\u00e1du; \u00falohou kn\u011bze je u\u010dit n\u00e1s, jak \u017e\u00edt v nov\u00e9 oblasti. Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed bohu\u017eel p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 \u010dasto p\u016fsob\u00ed odd\u011blen\u011b od prorok\u016f. Mluv\u00ed o nov\u00e9 \u0159\u00ed\u0161i, ale nikdy n\u00e1s nevyvedou ze star\u00e9ho \u0159\u00e1du, kde jsme st\u00e1le z velk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti uv\u011bzn\u011bni.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Do t\u00e9to nov\u00e9 \u0159\u00ed\u0161e pat\u0159\u00ed v\u0161echno. Toto v\u011bdom\u00ed se n\u011bkdy naz\u00fdv\u00e1 druhou naivitou. Je to n\u00e1vrat k prost\u00e9mu v\u011bdom\u00ed. Prvn\u00ed uv\u011bdom\u011bn\u00ed je nebezpe\u010dn\u00e1 naivita, kter\u00e1 nev\u00ed, ale mysl\u00ed si, \u017ee v\u00ed. V druh\u00e9 naivit\u011b koexistuje temnota a sv\u011btlo, odhaluje se paradox a my jsme kone\u010dn\u011b doma v jedin\u00e9m sv\u011bt\u011b, kter\u00fd kdy existoval. To je prav\u00e9 pozn\u00e1n\u00ed. Zde je smrt sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed \u017eivota a ne\u00fasp\u011bch sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed. Protiklady se st\u0159et\u00e1vaj\u00ed a spojuj\u00ed a v\u0161e k sob\u011b pat\u0159\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ve zral\u00e9m n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed se sv\u011btsk\u00e9 st\u00e1v\u00e1 posv\u00e1tn\u00fdm. U\u017e neexistuj\u00ed dva sv\u011bty. U\u017e nemus\u00edme opou\u0161t\u011bt sv\u011btsk\u00fd sv\u011bt, abychom na\u0161li posv\u00e1tn\u00fd prostor, proto\u017ee se spojily. To byl v\u00fdznam roztr\u017een\u00ed chr\u00e1mov\u00e9 opony, kdy\u017e Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 zem\u0159el. Chr\u00e1m rozd\u011bloval realitu na svat\u00fd sv\u011bt uvnit\u0159 a nesvat\u00fd sv\u011bt venku. Proto Je\u017e\u00ed\u0161 \u0159ekl, \u017ee chr\u00e1m mus\u00ed padnout: „Ani k\u00e1men na kameni nez\u016fstane st\u00e1t“ (Matou\u0161 24,2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Na\u0161e slovo „prof\u00e1nn\u00ed“ poch\u00e1z\u00ed z latinsk\u00fdch slov pro a fanum, co\u017e znamen\u00e1 „mimo chr\u00e1m“. Teilhard de Chardin \u0159ekl: „Nic zde dole nen\u00ed prof\u00e1nn\u00ed pro ty, kdo um\u00ed vid\u011bt.“ V tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b se jedn\u00e1 o „prof\u00e1nn\u00ed“. [1] Sv\u011bt je jen jeden, a to ten nadp\u0159irozen\u00fd. Neexistuje \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd „p\u0159irozen\u00fd“ sv\u011bt, kde by nebyl B\u016fh. V\u0161e je nadp\u0159irozen\u00e9. V\u0161echny ke\u0159e te\u010f ho\u0159\u00ed, pokud jsme vid\u011bli, \u017ee n\u011bjak\u00fd ho\u0159\u00ed. Jen jeden strom se mus\u00ed naplnit sv\u011btlem a and\u011bly, a pak u\u017e nikdy neuvid\u00edme stromy stejn\u011b. To je to prav\u00e9 vid\u011bn\u00ed, kter\u00e9mu \u0159\u00edk\u00e1me kontemplace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sv\u00e9 vid\u011bn\u00ed pot\u0159ebujeme osv\u011b\u017eit kontemplac\u00ed, proto\u017ee zapom\u00edn\u00e1me. Za\u010dneme lp\u011bt a chr\u00e1nit se. Pokud nen\u00ed ochota pustit se, neuvid\u00edme vid\u011bn\u00ed celku. Boha nelze vid\u011bt tak malou \u010do\u010dkou.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ch\u00e1pu, pro\u010d k\u0159es\u0165an\u00e9 pou\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed jazyk „znovuzrozen\u00ed“. Zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee velk\u00e9 tradice uzn\u00e1vaj\u00ed, \u017ee prvn\u00ed narozen\u00ed nesta\u010d\u00ed. Mus\u00edme se nejen narodit, ale tak\u00e9 p\u0159etvo\u0159it. P\u0159etvo\u0159en\u00ed du\u0161e a osv\u011b\u017een\u00ed oka je n\u00e1vratem k jednoduchosti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [1] Teilhard de Chardin, The Divine Milieu: An Essay on the Interior Life<\/em> (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960), 35. Image credit:<\/strong> A path from one week to the next\u2014Taylor Wilson, Madonna and Messiah<\/em> (detail), ink, used with permission. Alma Thomas, The Eclipse<\/em> (detail), 1970, acrylic on canvas, Smithsonian<\/a>. Alma Thomas, Snow Reflections on Pond<\/em> (detail), 1973, acrylic on canvas, Smithsonian<\/a>. Click here to enlarge image<\/a>. Sv\u00e9 vid\u011bn\u00ed pot\u0159ebujeme osv\u011b\u017eit kontemplac\u00ed, proto\u017ee zapom\u00edn\u00e1me. Za\u010dneme lp\u011bt a chr\u00e1nit se. Pokud nen\u00ed ochota pustit se, neuvid\u00edme vid\u011bn\u00ed celku. Boha nelze vid\u011bt tak malou \u010do\u010dkou.<\/p>\n Ch\u00e1pu, pro\u010d k\u0159es\u0165an\u00e9 pou\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed jazyk „znovuzrozen\u00ed“. Zd\u00e1 se, \u017ee velk\u00e9 tradice uzn\u00e1vaj\u00ed, \u017ee prvn\u00ed narozen\u00ed nesta\u010d\u00ed. Mus\u00edme se nejen narodit, ale tak\u00e9 p\u0159etvo\u0159it. P\u0159etvo\u0159en\u00ed du\u0161e a osv\u011b\u017een\u00ed oka je n\u00e1vratem k jednoduchosti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7556,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[198],"tags":[401,1307],"class_list":["post-7578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-richard-rohr-ofm-centrum-pro-zivot-a-rozjimani","tag-kontemplace","tag-znovuzrozeni","latest_post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7579,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7578\/revisions\/7579"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frantiskani.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Opustit to na co jsme zvykl\u00ed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Kn\u011b\u017e\u00ed n\u00e1s \u010dast\u011bji ponech\u00e1vaj\u00ed v p\u016fvodn\u00edm prostoru<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
My v\u0161ak pot\u0159ebujeme vstoupit do sv\u011bta paradoxu<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Ve zral\u00e9m n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed se sv\u011btsk\u00e9 st\u00e1v\u00e1 posv\u00e1tn\u00fdm<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Kontemplace<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
N\u00e1vrat k jednoduchosti<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Prameny:<\/h6>\n\n\n\n
Adapted from Richard Rohr, Everything Belongs: The Gift of Contemplative Prayer<\/em><\/a>, rev. ed. (New York: Crossroad Publishing, 2003), 158\u2013159, 160.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Creation is sacred space; the multi-colored spot of paint on canvas echoes the light through a stained-glass window.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"